Re: Flex

[David Scott <suppressed>]

AJAX is anything but time-consuming once you get the hang of it.  I much 
prefer it to traditional server-side dynamic page construction, which 
really is time-consuming.

If you haven't seen ExtJS yet, you're missing something:  
http://www.extjs.com.

d

Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2007 3:22 PM, Will Fould <suppressed> wrote:
>   
> > Have you thought about it too?
> >     
>
> Yes.  It sounds possibly quicker than AJAX, which is pretty
> time-consuming to develop for anything non-trivial.  (Google makes it
> look easy, but they probably spent millions debugging those maps on
> multiple browsers.)  I haven't tried it, but my approach would be to
> convert one of the PHP examples.
>
> - Perrin
>
>