Re: Prob. installing libapreq2 under Leopard

[Fred Moyer <suppressed>]

Hendrik Van Belleghem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> actually, I double checked.. rebuild Apache2::Request from scratch after 
> removing every reference to existing A2::R.. Same error applies.
> I never loaded the module into the httpd.conf though. I stuck to using 
> it as a replacement for CGI (but for mod_perl) :)

So adding LoadModule apreq_module fixed it?

> Hendrik
>
> On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Fred Moyer <suppressed 
> <mailto:suppressed>> wrote:
>
>     Hendrik Van Belleghem wrote:
>      > This fixed the compilation.. but when I loaded it in my code, it spit
>      > out the following message in my logs:
>      >
>      > dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found:
>     _apreq_handle_apache2
>
>     I'm going to take a guess here and say that you have more than one
>     version of libapreq installed.
>
>     or... are you sure that you have LoadModule apreq_module mod_apreq2.so
>     pointing to the correct version of libapreq?
>
>
>      >   Referenced from: /Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin
>      > -thread-multi-2level/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.bundle
>      >   Expected in: dynamic lookup
>      >
>      > dyld: Symbol not found: _apreq_handle_apache2
>      >   Referenced from:
>      >
>     /Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin-thread-multi-2level/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.bundle
>      >   Expected in: dynamic lookup
>      >
>      > Anyone any suggestions on how to fix this?
>      >
>      > Hendrik
>      >
>      >
>      > On Nov 11, 2007 6:12 PM, Laurent MARTIN <suppressed
>     <mailto:suppressed>
>      > <mailto: suppressed <mailto:suppressed>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >     Hi there!
>      >
>      >     I'm trying to install libapreq2 under my newly installed Mac OS X
>      >     10.5 on a MacBook Pro (Core Duo 2, SantaRosa), but something
>     must be
>      >     wrong in what I'm doing as Apache refuses to launch as soon
>     as I add
>      >     the following to the httpd.conf file:
>      >     LoadModule apreq_module libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so
>      >     Below is the message I get in the console:
>      >     httpd: Syntax error on line 509 of
>     /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
>      >     Cannot load /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so into server:
>      >     dlopen(/usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so, 10): no suitable
>     image
>      >     found.  Did find:\n\t/usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so:
>     mach-o, but
>      >     wrong architecture
>      >
>      >     FYI, I'm using the default softwares provided with Leopard:
>     Apache
>      >     2.2.6 & mod_perl 2.0.2 & Perl 5.8.8.
>      >
>      >     What I'm typing to install libapreq2:
>      >     % perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs
>      >     % make
>      >     % sudo make install
>      >
>      >     I've noticed the following message while compiling (make):
>      >     ld: warning in
>      >    
>     /Users/laurent/Downloads/libapreq2-2.08/library/.libs/libapreq2.dylib,
>      >     file is not of required architecture
>      >
>      >     If it can help, here is what I get when I apply the "file"
>     command
>      >     on this .dylib file:
>      >    
>     /Users/laurent/Downloads/libapreq2-2.08/library/.libs/libapreq2.dylib:
>      >     Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386
>      >     After having installed (sudo make install), here is what I
>     get when
>      >     I apply the "file" command on the newly created and
>      >     installed /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so file:
>      >     /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so: Mach-O bundle i386
>      >     Is this normal? Below is what I get for example for the
>     mod_perl.so
>      >     file:
>      >     mod_perl.so: Mach-O universal binary with 4 architectures
>      >     mod_perl.so (for architecture ppc7400): Mach-O bundle ppc
>      >     mod_perl.so (for architecture ppc64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle ppc64
>      >     mod_perl.so (for architecture i386): Mach-O bundle i386
>      >     mod_perl.so (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle
>     x86_64
>      >     Shouldn't I get the same for all .so file? Shouldn't
>     mod_apreq2.so
>      >      be compiled as universal binary too?
>      >
>      >     Any idea? Thank you very much in advance!
>      >
>      >     --
>      >     *Laurent*, Nantes (FR) -  *http://blog.lmartin.fr*
>      >     < http://blog.lmartin.fr/>
>      >     /Apple MacBook Pro 15"/
>      >     /Nokia Internet Tablet N800/
>      >     /Palm Treo 650 (unlocked GSM)/
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > --
>      > Hendrik Van Belleghem
>      > Spine - The backbone for your website - http://spine.sf.net
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Van Belleghem
> Spine - The backbone for your website - http://spine.sf.net