Hendrik Van Belleghem wrote:I'm going to take a guess here and say that you have more than one
> This fixed the compilation.. but when I loaded it in my code, it spit
> out the following message in my logs:
>
> dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _apreq_handle_apache2
version of libapreq installed.
or... are you sure that you have LoadModule apreq_module mod_apreq2.so
pointing to the correct version of libapreq?
> Referenced from: /Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin
> -thread-multi-2level/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.bundle
> Expected in: dynamic lookup
>
> dyld: Symbol not found: _apreq_handle_apache2
> Referenced from:
> /Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin-thread-multi-2level/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.bundle
> Expected in: dynamic lookup
>
> Anyone any suggestions on how to fix this?
>
> Hendrik
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2007 6:12 PM, Laurent MARTIN <suppressed> *Laurent*, Nantes (FR) - *http://blog.lmartin.fr*> <mailto: suppressed>> wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> I'm trying to install libapreq2 under my newly installed Mac OS X
> 10.5 on a MacBook Pro (Core Duo 2, SantaRosa), but something must be
> wrong in what I'm doing as Apache refuses to launch as soon as I add
> the following to the httpd.conf file:
> LoadModule apreq_module libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so
> Below is the message I get in the console:
> httpd: Syntax error on line 509 of /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so into server:
> dlopen(/usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so, 10): no suitable image
> found. Did find:\n\t/usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so: mach-o, but
> wrong architecture
>
> FYI, I'm using the default softwares provided with Leopard: Apache
> 2.2.6 & mod_perl 2.0.2 & Perl 5.8.8.
>
> What I'm typing to install libapreq2:
> % perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs
> % make
> % sudo make install
>
> I've noticed the following message while compiling (make):
> ld: warning in
> /Users/laurent/Downloads/libapreq2-2.08/library/.libs/libapreq2.dylib,
> file is not of required architecture
>
> If it can help, here is what I get when I apply the "file" command
> on this .dylib file:
> /Users/laurent/Downloads/libapreq2-2.08/library/.libs/libapreq2.dylib:
> Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386
> After having installed (sudo make install), here is what I get when
> I apply the "file" command on the newly created and
> installed /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so file:
> /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so: Mach-O bundle i386
> Is this normal? Below is what I get for example for the mod_perl.so
> file:
> mod_perl.so: Mach-O universal binary with 4 architectures
> mod_perl.so (for architecture ppc7400): Mach-O bundle ppc
> mod_perl.so (for architecture ppc64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle ppc64
> mod_perl.so (for architecture i386): Mach-O bundle i386
> mod_perl.so (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle x86_64
> Shouldn't I get the same for all .so file? Shouldn't mod_apreq2.so
> be compiled as universal binary too?
>
> Any idea? Thank you very much in advance!
>
> --> < http://blog.lmartin.fr/>
> /Apple MacBook Pro 15"/
> /Nokia Internet Tablet N800/
> /Palm Treo 650 (unlocked GSM)/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Van Belleghem
> Spine - The backbone for your website - http://spine.sf.net
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.