how about some case-specific information about your request:why exactly do you want a pool of db handles, vs additional db connections ?
what db are you using ?depending on your design and platform, a dbpool might not be a good idea -- or you could be best-off with a middleware dbpool. for a while i was using pgpool , which is an intermediary server to pool pg connections. i had 60 connections to pgpool, and 40 connections from pgpool the db. but then i got 2 gb more ram, and didn't need it.
// Jonathan Vanasco| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| CEO/Founder SyndiClick| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| FindMeOn.com - The cure for Multiple Web Personality Disorder | Web Identity Management and 3D Social Networking| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| RoadSound.com - Tools For Bands, Stuff For Fans | Collaborative Online Management And Syndication Tools| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.