[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Are RHEL 3.0 & mod_perl 2.0.x compatible?
- Subject: Are RHEL 3.0 & mod_perl 2.0.x compatible?
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:48:36 -0500
- From: "Dylan Tynan" <suppressed>
Hi
folks,
Been a few years
since I've worked on mod_perl & I could use a helping hand. Does
anyone know if RHEL 3.0 and mod_perl 2.0.x (like 2.0.2) are more or less
compatible? RHEL 3.0 ships with that semi-mutant 1.99 development
track mod_perl ........ I tried upgrading (on an x86_64 arch) to
2.0.2 today and ran into endless numbers of dependencies --- basically
practically causing an upgrade to 4.0 piecemeal. It started with, oddly
enough, an rpm dependency failure on perl(Carp::Heavy) [yeah weird I
thought]. Unfortunately, on x86_64 that doesn't seem to be available until
Perl 5.8.5 (yet 5.6 on the regular x32), then the dependency trail just goes on
forever with something needing something else, etc.....
In looking around out there on the 'net, there was very very little info about
this combination (mod_perl2 & RHEL3), and what was out there was
mainly a few people w/problems.....
Anyone have any info
on this combo? I ended up pretty much whacking the system (great way to
start off back on mod_perl again, ugh!) so I could really really use an
answer on this if anyone knows so I can pass it up the chain before I end up
doing something else stupid trying to make it work, heh....
Thanks!
Dylan
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.