Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?

[Andy Armstrong <suppressed>]

On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:19, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> I still like the CGI::Simple is lighter weight, but it just didn't  
> work
> well enough for me. (I'm sorry my memory doesn't recall the exact  
> issues
>  anymore... it may have been related to file uploading.)

Ring any bells?

http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=14838

I've just been working with your test case this afternoon funnily  
enough. I can see what it's doing wrong but the code is fragile  
enough and the test coverage poor enough that I'm proceeding with  
caution. If I'm going to fix it I need to beef the tests up first.

--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net