Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?

Subject: Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:13:59 -0500
From: Michael Peters <suppressed>

Andy Armstrong wrote:

> Part of my reason for posting is to try and work out whether anyone's
> actually using it.

I'd say the user's of it on this list would be pretty small. But I've heard it's
popular for normal CGI folks and people using FCGI since they can save on memory
and can't use the Apache::Request stuff.

I'd try posting a query to perlmonks.

-- 
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
  - From: Andy Armstrong

References:
- Anyone using CGI::Simple?
  - From: Andy Armstrong
- Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
  - From: Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
  - From: Andy Armstrong

Prev by Date: Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
Next by Date: Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
Previous by thread: Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
Next by thread: Re: Anyone using CGI::Simple?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.