Re: [ic] SocketReadTimeout question

[Peter <suppressed>]

On 02/05/2008 03:39 PM, Grant wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any more info on why SocketReadTimeout came into
> > > being?  Is it designed to solve some broken pipe problems?
> > One of the core developers discovered that there are some ssl proxy
> > servers on a particular ISP that take longer to respond than the
> > (previously hard-coded) 1 second default.  If you have this problem with
> > some of your customers then setting this value to something higher than
> > 5 or so will allow those proxy servers to work.  On the downside it can
> > also make IC more vulnerable to a certain type of DOS attack so you
> > shouldn't adjust this unless you really need to.
> >
> > Peter
>
> Thanks Peter.  How would that type of problem make itself known?  ssl_error_log?

According to 
http://www.interchange.rtfm.info/icdocs/config/SocketReadTimeout.html 
you would get read errors in your global error.log file.

Peter

_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
suppressed
http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users