Quoting Peter (suppressed): > It would seem to make sense to me to allow this to be configurable, even > state-by-state (a column in the state table) so that IC will have the > ability to better adapt to different tax laws in different areas. That won't happen, not for the ENTIRE_ORDER scenario we describe. > > I would propose allowing the use of special subs that can be picked from > the state and/or country tables with a few defaults. That would allow > customization for whatever weird taxation laws someone may come across > (that we don't anticipate). > That makes sense. Indeed, we already have it, as you can put ITL right in the salestax.asc file, and you can define subroutines via Levies. -- Mike Heins Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/ phone +1.765.647.1295 tollfree 800-949-1889 <suppressed> Find the grain of truth in criticism, chew it, and swallow it. -- anonymous _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.