Grant <suppressed> wrote: > > > What do you guys think is the best way to determine if a particular > > > session is being tracked via a cookie or a query string? > > > > > You shouldn't need to determine that at all. Interchange takes care > > of the session itself, so you don't have to. > > > > If you really want to know, then use [read-cookie MV_SESSION_ID]. > > If that tag returns a value then a MV_SESSION_ID cookie exists and > > Interchange will be using it to track the session. > > > > http://www.interchange.rtfm.info/icdocs/tags/read-cookie.html > > > Thanks Kevin, I'll use that to determine if an order placed was making > use of the session cookie or not. I'm trying to weigh the pros and > cons of mv_no_session (no session in the URL ever) vs. > mv_no_session_id (no session in the URL unless cookie returned). > Well, you definitely don't want mv_no_session as a permanent setting (ScratchDefault). You might want to occasionally set mv_no_session temporarily to build a specific URI, but you can do that with an [area] parameter, or a temporary scratchpad setting, as an when required. The mv_no_session_id is another matter, and you probably do want to set that to be permanently on with ScratchDefault. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ suppressed _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.