Re: [ic] When will mv_(\w+) be ic_$1 ?

[Kevin Walsh <suppressed>]

Bill Carr <suppressed> wrote:
> When will mv_(\w+) be ic_$1 ?
>
Probably never, for backward compatibility reasons.

It is still advisable to treat the "ic_" prefix the with the same care
as you do with "mv_" when creating your own variables  (i.e. don't use
it at all unless you know what you're doing), as Interchange might
suddenly start using the "ic_" and "IC_" prefixes in new variables in
the future.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/    suppressed
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/
_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
suppressed
http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users