Henry Hartley wrote: > I'm curious what the current situation is with regard to Interchange and > threaded Perl. I'm mostly familiar with Red Hat and Fedora > distributions of Linux and they both come with threaded perl by default. > I know the last time I was working with Interchange I needed to get a > non-threaded perl running. While it isn't a show stopper, it would > certainly be easier if a machine could be run with the standard load. > In addition to being easier to set up, it also means that patches to > perl and its various modules can be updated automatically with yum > rather than by hand. In fact, it would be nice if I could yum update > interchange, as well. > > So, what is the status with Interchange and threaded Perl? Is > non-threaded perl still required? With a recent Perl/DBI combination, non-threaded Perl isn't required but still recommended. > > I also understand that there were performance considerations. For me, > and for the site I'm preparing to work on, traffic will be low and I > suspect the performance issues won't be a big factor. If the only > reason to require non-threaded perl is for performance, wouldn't it be > better to allow it to run with threaded perl and just recommend > non-threaded for performance reasons? > DBI authors claimed to improve performance with threaded perl in version 1.51, released a couple of days ago. Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.