Jamie Neil wrote .. > Gert van der Spoel wrote: > > We'll have to see whether we value this specific xhtml compatibility > > enough to use a different approach to inserting <meta> tags (one that > > would put them inside <head />, or we will simply remove the xhtml > > icon. > > Is XHTML actually a good idea? I've heard a number of credible people > recently saying that it's better to stick to HTML 4.01 strict until > proper XML is supported. > > Why most of us should NOT use XHTML - > http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/12026.htm > > -- > Jamie Neil | <suppressed> | 0870 7777 454 > Versado I.T. Services Ltd. | http://versado.net/ | 0845 450 1254 > _______________________________________________ > interchange-users mailing list > suppressed > http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users the actual article is at: http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.