Jamie Neil <suppressed> wrote: > Gert van der Spoel wrote: > > We'll have to see whether we value this specific xhtml compatibility > > enough to use a different approach to inserting <meta> tags (one that > > would put them inside <head />, or we will simply remove the xhtml > > icon. > > Is XHTML actually a good idea? I've heard a number of credible people > recently saying that it's better to stick to HTML 4.01 strict until > proper XML is supported. > I agree. I never use XHTML myself, and will continue to avoid it for the forseeable future. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ suppressed _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.