Quoting Jamie Neil (suppressed): > Gert van der Spoel wrote: > > We'll have to see whether we value this specific xhtml compatibility > > enough to use a different approach to inserting <meta> tags (one that > > would put them inside <head />, or we will simply remove the xhtml > > icon. > > Is XHTML actually a good idea? I've heard a number of credible people > recently saying that it's better to stick to HTML 4.01 strict until > proper XML is supported. > > Why most of us should NOT use XHTML - > http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/12026.htm It isn't usually a good idea to post members-only URLs here... -- Mike Heins Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/ phone +1.765.647.1295 tollfree 800-949-1889 <suppressed> Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. -- Thomas Edison _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.