[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ic] (no subject)


Gert van der Spoel wrote:
> We'll have to see whether we value this specific xhtml compatibility
> enough to use a different approach to inserting <meta> tags (one that
> would put them inside <head />, or we will simply remove the xhtml
> icon.

Is XHTML actually a good idea? I've heard a number of credible people
recently saying that it's better to stick to HTML 4.01 strict until
proper XML is supported.

Why most of us should NOT use XHTML -
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/12026.htm

-- 
Jamie Neil | <suppressed> | 0870 7777 454
Versado I.T. Services Ltd. | http://versado.net/ | 0845 450 1254
_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
suppressed
http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users


Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.