> What you call duplication, I call redundancy. And during the process > of creating a new set of documentation, I would have valued redundancy quite > high. I would, too, value redundancy. But here we are talking about duplication. > I haven't changed my opinion too much since last mail exchange here on > the list: There are the few Interchange developers who don't need the > documentation, and many others who need them to get going. > > > I wanted to understand the [perl] tag. Result : > DESCRIPTION > > BEHAVIOR > > This tag does not appear to be affected by, or affect, the rest of Interchange. > > > I needed some background on [if] - Not even listed. > > > It's simply that I don't understand the priorities of Davor's > documentation project, as you call it. And you don't need to understand them (pardon my impatience with you that has grown really high now). > > The documentation effort definitely benefits from submissions and input, > > so don't get me wrong. > > > No problem, Racke. And you point is well taken. Only that I don't have > a very high esteem on how this is done, so count on me for other areas. Give me a break. _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.