John1 suppressed wrote: > Snip from earlier post to this thread by Kevin: > > Thanks for posting the packet data. I'll use that to try to recreate > > the problem locally. I imagine I'll have to throttle the link and/or > > fire truck-loads of simultaneous requests to get the problem to show > > itself. If the problem can be recreated on demand then it can be found > > and fixed. I have an old P200 that I use for performance tests. Test > > time differences are amplified massively when running Interchange on a > > P200 with 128MB of memory. :-) > > > Kevin, did you get chance to do this? > I've not had a lot of time to devote to this. Sorry. The tests I have performed have not caused anything fail. I've not seen any of the websites under my control fail with the reported problems, even though most of them were/are being targeted by all of the current worms. I imagine that I'd look into this a little more urgently if my clients' websites were all falling in a heap every ten minutes. :-) -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ suppressed _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.