On 12/14/05 11:45 AM, "Mike Heins" <suppressed> wrote: > Quoting Sam Batschelet (suppressed): >> Mike, Kevin, Jon, All, >> >> I just got blasted for having my mailing list setup like Interchanges with >> "Reply-To" Munging, and was wondering if you might want to consider this? >> >> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >> >> Just a thought > > We have been operating this way for seven years with no complaints. As > far as I am concerned, the matter is closed; I don't want to discuss it > any more; any further discussion will have to go on without me. 8-) > > The link you were sent is very, very, outdated -- the author refers > to the "elm" mailer, which is ancient and not in use hardly at all > (mutt has replaced it almost entirely). Though it is dated 2002, I > am guessing it is minor edits. > > Some people have a different view of mail lists, and that is fine. But > to have them subject others to the religious fervor of their views > strikes me as a bit grandiose. If they can't state the "harm" in > the first screen of their diatribe, then it isn't that harmful. No complaints here Mike I thought it was foolish myself why not have where you are sending the message to in the header but I can tell its a touchy subject so I will bow out gracefully. When I read the page I thought that to myself as well ok where is the harm part. But as such a big deal was made of it I thought I would forward the link. -Sam _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.