Quoting Sam Batschelet (suppressed): > Mike, Kevin, Jon, All, > > I just got blasted for having my mailing list setup like Interchanges with > "Reply-To" Munging, and was wondering if you might want to consider this? > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Just a thought We have been operating this way for seven years with no complaints. As far as I am concerned, the matter is closed; I don't want to discuss it any more; any further discussion will have to go on without me. 8-) The link you were sent is very, very, outdated -- the author refers to the "elm" mailer, which is ancient and not in use hardly at all (mutt has replaced it almost entirely). Though it is dated 2002, I am guessing it is minor edits. Some people have a different view of mail lists, and that is fine. But to have them subject others to the religious fervor of their views strikes me as a bit grandiose. If they can't state the "harm" in the first screen of their diatribe, then it isn't that harmful. -- Mike Heins Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/ phone +1.765.647.1295 tollfree 800-949-1889 <suppressed> Experience is what allows you to recognize a mistake the second time you make it. -- unknown _______________________________________________ interchange-users mailing list suppressed http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.