RE: [ic] mod_interchange and Apache MaxClients

["Kevin Walsh" <suppressed>]

John1 suppressed wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2005 1:19 PM, suppressed wrote:
> > > So perhaps we should make the IC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT to be the payment
> > > gateway timeout + a couple seconds?
> > > 
> > That's an option...<snip>
> > 
> But are we now saying that IC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT is the timeout for
> mod_interchange trying to *open* a connection with Interchange (and not a
> timeout for mod_interchange awaiting a response from Interchange)?
> 
Yes.  I should remind myself by reading the code instead of posting
from memory. :-)

>
> If so, presumably IC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT should not be related to the payment
> gateway timeout, or do I misunderstand?  Thanks
> 
Correct.  The timeout will have no effect in this case.  The timeout might
as well remain as a configurable variable, so I won't back out the change
I made to handle the new parameter.

I believe Interchange is in the clear as far as this issue is concerned.
Let me know if you still think it's at fault.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/    suppressed
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/

_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
suppressed
http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users