[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ic] Interchange version ?


Quoting Schuyler Langdon (suppressed):
> ADDING Attribution! Quoting Mike:
> > Quoting Schuyler Langdon (suppressed):
> > > For a real business application, I would recommend the stable
> > > release over the current release. I ran through the latest demo
> > > recently and the parts of the admin manual order placement did
> > > work as expected. This was the only functionality I looked at but
> > > I imagine with the current revamp there would be other
> > > inconsistancies as well.
> > >
> >
> > And I would recommend the opposite. If you are developing now and use
> > 4.8, you will be developing with outdated and unsupported code.
> >
> > WRT the functionality of the new order stuff, it requires a new
> > catalog order routing to work totally. It is *supposed* to work
> > with the old foundation, but assuredly if you have done custom
> > log_transaction or log_entry it may not.
> >
> 
> So the stable version is "outdated and unsupported" and the current version
> is not the stable version. What a conundrum!!
> 

It is, isn't it. When you want to put in the hundreds of hours that it
requires to release-tune Interchange, let me know. We can always use
help.

-- 
Mike Heins
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting    http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.513.523.7621      <suppressed>

Any man who is under 30, and is not liberal, has not heart; and any man
who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has not brains.
 -- Winston Churchill
_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
suppressed
http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users


Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.