A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Karen <suppressed> [2007-10-21 03:40]:Plus, how many Mason-only or TT-only modules are there out there? More than there are H::T-only modules, right? You can hardly begrudge us H::T users *our* occasional exclusives, can you?Personally, I’m not picking sides. I don’t know what sort of devil rode me when I picked TT, but despite initial experience it turned out to be terrible. H::T had seemed appealing until I tried it, before TT. Right now I am thinking that Mason or Petal might be lesser evils (in different ways), but Mason puts me off because it is full of framework gunk and Petal’s minilanguage is about as bad as minilanguages can be. As far as I’m concerned, for generating markup, every last one of the templating modules on CPAN is dreadful. I’d rather not be needlessly forced into *any* of them.
So what would you use? The major ones for C::A are TT and H::T and you don't like either. Mason does not play very well at the CGI level which is one reason I don't use it. Play there means performance wise. You really need mod_perl to use it right. Petal is out as well, though I have never tried that one.
I use both TT and H::T depending on the project. I love the fact that I can just install C::A and get H::T and hit the ground running.
I have only seen you post things you don't like. So, what would you use? Robert ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.