Re: [cgiapp] Tests and CGI::Application

[Jason Purdy <suppressed>]

This is definitely a good approach, but what it lacks is coverage 
reporting capabilities, should you want to know how much of your code is 
covered.

Since someone previously posted about T:W:M:CGI, I've been playing 
around with that and it also has some flaws that I haven't been able to 
resolve - filed a bug report:

http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=26203

CGIApp testing is really in a state of chaos, in that there is no one 
"ring to rule them all", so to speak.  I wrote about this a while ago, 
but never got around to the implementation:

http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/msg04299.html

It looks like George Hartzell has one solution posted (thanks, George!) 
-- I need to check that out:

http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/msg06081.html

- Jason

David Scott wrote:
> Dan,

[snip]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
             http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed