hi
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Horne [mailto:suppressed
> Well, if you're uploading 20GB of photos then don't you think
> mod_perl is a bit of overkill?
not so sure i understand what you mean by 'overkill'.
mod_perl will use your web server's resources more efficiently, and with
20GB of data to process, i would think these resources would be best
used on other tasks beside the webserver upload.
the mod_perl API is maybe a bit more difficult than CGI, but not too.
and it mimics CGI's API in most places.
> From my perspective, you use mod_perl for 2 reasons:
i guess we have different perspectives.
> and mod_perl is a lot more resource intensive than CGI
i find this very difficult to believe. do you have any references/data
that support this point? everything i've ever read and/or done myself
has pointed out that mod_perl uses far *fewer* resources than CGI.
that's why people use it.
maybe this is getting too far OT for a C:A mailing list ... [mod_perl
advocacy]
--
\js
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.