Re: [cgiapp] RFC: CGI::Application::Plugin::REST

["Jaldhar H. Vyas" <suppressed>]

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Timothy Appnel wrote:

> On 1/2/07, Jaldhar H. Vyas <suppressed> wrote:
>
> > >  I like the way Catalyst::Action::REST implements its REST
> > >  functionality personally.
> >
> >  You mean with attributes?
>
> No, through method naming conventions such as...
>
>   entry_POST
>   entry_GET
>   entry_PUT
>
> ...where entry is the defined runmode. If a runmode_HTTPMETHOD doesn't
> exist the dispatcher automatically returns a method is not supported
> HTTP status method.
>
> <tim/>

Ah I seem to remember looking at the Catalyst REST plugin a while back and 
thinking it used attributes.  Maybe that was something else.

I'd like to get some more opinions on this.  To me this seems really 
yucky for some reason.

--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <suppressed>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
             http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed