On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:38:22 +0100, RA Jones wrote:
Hi RA
> is always required irrespective of store method? Is there any way
> round this save the horrible kludge of passing the parameter as an
> embedded hidden form field or tacked onto the end of clickable
> links?
Aren't you being a teensy bit fanatical on this one? Hint: The correct reply is
Yes, I am.
A method which works, eg form fields, is always going to be better than one
which fails, eg non-functioning cookies, even if the later was chosen for the
most fanatical of reasons :-))).
--
Cheers
Ron Savage, suppressed on 28/03/2006
http://savage.net.au/index.html
Let the record show: Microsoft is not an Australian company
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.