[cgiapp] Re: The future of the CGI::App web presence

[Mark Stosberg <suppressed>]

On 2005-07-20, Christopher Hicks <suppressed> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Michael Graham wrote:
>> So we decided to go the homegrown route and make a Trac-replacement out
>> of SVN, SVK, darcs, and RT (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/).
>
> Was bugzilla considered?  RT is ok, but bugzilla is quite nice.

I might have miscommunicated about RT. I don't want to install a new BTS
at all. I want to use rt.cpan.org. Not because it rocks the hardest, but
as a pragmatic decision: It's already there and it works well enough.

I can't think of any other perl module projects that bother to use
another BTS. 

It's possible to do some basic integration just by putting "RT#233" in
the commit messages. I describe that in more detail here:
http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/SpontaneousBranches

You can then parse the log history and generating links to the BTS.


   Mark

-- 
http://mark.stosberg.com/ 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
              http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed