Re: [cgiapp] Re: [OT] CGI::Session is good, but we can do better (a new project is born?)

[Sean Davis <suppressed>]

On Jun 17, 2005, at 12:14 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote:

> On 2005-06-17, David Emery <suppressed> wrote:
> > The couple of times I've tried working with Class::DBI, I found that
> > it was quite noticably slow compared with doing the same thing via SQL
> > + DBI. I think that could be a problem with something like sessions
> > that tend to get run on every request.
>
> Performance is a concern I share, and I don't know how well Class::DBI
> will do there. However, assuming I don't expose anything that would
> very Class::DBI specific, the backend could be updated later, and much
> of the value returned.

And just to add to the Class::DBI discussion a bit, there has been a 
fair amount of discussion on the Class::DBI email list of the behavior 
of Class::DBI (and more specifically Ima::DBI) under mod_perl.  I 
haven't been following the discussion closely at all, but I would have 
to say it is a concern requiring some thought for those using mod_perl.

Sean


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
             http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed