Re: [cgiapp] Re: [OT] CGI::Session is good, but we can do better (a new project is born?)

[Ron Savage <suppressed>]

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:33:44 +0000 (UTC), Mark Stosberg wrote:

Hi Mark

> Curious. There is also currently my CGI::Session::PureSQL, which is
> build to work with PostgreSQL, but not tested on Windows.

This looks like a case of: I really should find time to test that module...

> There's lots of new callbacks stuff being used in DFV 4.0. It seems
> to be a theme around here...

Yeah, right - and by Monday (joke) my customer wants to go into production, with 1 (yes, one) CGI form containing up to 1,650 CGI fields.

You guys just don't realize how easy your jobs are :-)).
--
Ron Savage
suppressed
http://savage.net.au/index.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
              http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed