Re: [cgiapp] Re: Yet another callback system proposal

[Cees Hek <suppressed>]

On 5/25/05, Brett Sanger <suppressed> wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 12:08:28PM -0400, Cees Hek wrote:
> > what is happening, but that is one of the reasons I wrote the
> > LogDispatch plugin, which contains a feature that will log the
> 
> Ooo!  That's been on my todo list for a while.  I've only been skimming
> the callback discussions...how far is this from being stable enough to
> start rolling out on production code?

I'm not 100% which 'it' you are referring to here.  I would consider
the LogDispatch plugin ready for production use.  If I still have a
disclaimer in the docs about stability, I will remove it in the next
distribution, as I haven't heard of any problems, and I believe there
are several people using the plugin successfully (besides me that is).

If you are specifically talking about the execution logging feature,
it works great for me (I don't use it that often, but it has bailed me
out of a difficult debugging problem a few times).  As for using it in
production code, this is really aimed as a debugging tool, so I can't
see the benefit of running it in production.

Cheers,

Cees

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
              http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed