On Thu, 19 May 2005, Jason Purdy wrote:
> So instead of widening the "people" table to support these fields
> (and having to alter the table every time), I'm thinking of
> developing a datapoint type of system, where you'd have one table of
> datapoints:
This is a bad idea, but it's also a very common one. It basically
treats a relational database as a glorified hash, storing sets of
completely denormalized key-value pairs in giant tables. Sometimes
that's really what you need, but I suspect that your situation isn't
that extreme.
-sam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.