[cgiapp] Re: RFC - C::A::Plugin - abstract base class for plugins

["Lance A. Brown" <suppressed>]

Bill Catlan wrote:
> Fair enough.  I just think using the app modules
> namespace for a C::A plugin is not as clean and adds a
> programmer step for every module.  I probably will
> want some plugins available across my modules - why
> should I have to bring them in in every module?  Let
> C::A do it.

Or you can create a C::A::MyBase package that pulls in your standard 
set of plugins and then inherit all your apps from that. :-)  Minimal 
extra programmer step.

--[Lance]
--
 Celebrate The Circle: http://www.celebratethecircle.org/
 Carolina Spirit Quest:  http://www.carolinaspiritquest.org/
 My LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/labrown/
 GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
             http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed