> for extra functionality, but doesn't confuse people into thinking that it
> might be a replacement or successor.
OK for "successor", but ::Plus is actually a replacement, so I tried to solve
this issue by writing in the doc very clearly that it is not a subclass, and it
is a stand alone new rewriting
> Similarly, I'd go so far to suggest CGI::Application::Framework:: as a
> potential namespace for projects like CheesePizza which offer a more
> complete set of functionality than just repacing CGI::Appliation.
Any Name::Space:: is intended by CPAN as something that is not necessarily
related with what comes after. for example, look at the CGI:: namespace and
CGI::Application namespace, so IMHO adding a new sub-level moves just the
problem forward, and really I don't see a problem with that.
I've just realized that the REAL problem is the use of an adjective instead of a
noun. Think about that... in natural language the adjective is perceived as a
quality of the thing it refers to, so it seems to be the same, with just a that
more quality.
domizio Demichelis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed
Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.