Re: [cgiapp] CGI::App 3.2 proposed release available

[Terrence Brannon <suppressed>]

Mark Stosberg wrote:

> From working with the code, I also have a number of other suggestions
> which I think will improve the distribution and make it easier to
> maintain:
>
>
> - Jump on the "Module::Build" bandwagon to promote this more pleasant
>  and portable alternative to MakeMaker. For the simple needs of
>  CGI::Application, we could use the 'traditional' compatibility option. 
>  This would mean that users wouldn't even need Module::Build to install
>  it because an old-school Makefile.PL would be auto-generated.
>
> 	Mark
>
>  
Module::Build is stil rather new in my opinion. I cross-posted to dfv 
and the mb lists about not being able to install Data::FormValidator in 
my local tree as opposed to /usr (just try it at perlmonk.org sometime!) 
and Ken hasn't been around to fix it. I am using CGI::Application at 
perlmonk.org for a gaming site and don't want to have to hand-install it 
because we switched over to M::B.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
             http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed