[cgiapp] Re: Comments requested

[Mark Stosberg <suppressed>]

On 2003-10-19, Christopher Hicks <suppressed> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>> I think I find the "mix-in" method the most intuitive way to handle
>> plug-in methods generically.
>
> The DBI/DBD model for plug-ins is much more intuitive from the module user
> perspective, but it does take a lot of work to pull off something that
> elegant.  Any volunteers?  :)

You mean how there are lots of "DBD::*" modules which talk to different
backends? That seems like a different case to me, since the the DBD::*
modules are mostly trying to implement the same interface. With
CGI::App plug-ins, I would imagine that each one would mostly be
defining it's own interface for unique functionality.

If you are referring to something else, could you elaborate?

Thanks,


	Mark

-- 
http://mark.stosberg.com/ 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
              http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed