Re: [cgiapp] CGI::App::DAO was: app example using best practices

[Peter Masiar <suppressed>]

Quoting Vladimir Bogdanov <suppressed>:

> Relating to what's been mentioned here about the P5EE standards, I'm 
> tinkering with a DAO base object for CGI::App.  I've given it a 
> preliminary name of CGI::Application::DAO.
...snip...
> I've successfully used basic implementation of CGI::Application::DAO in 
> one of my existing web projects based on CGI-App.  For that project, I 
> simply had to extend the base CGI-App dao and add extra functionality as 
> was needed. ;-)

I looked into DBIx::Abstract and DBIx::Recordset as DBI wrappers, among other.

(1) Why your DAO set is better what existing DBI wrappers? 
(2) Shouldn't it be DBIx::DAO instead? Why not?

Sorry if I am asking wrong questions.
I am not OO guru and never read your DAO code, too... ;-)

-- 
Peter Masiar, 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/suppressed/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppressed
For additional commands, e-mail: suppressed