Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability

Subject: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:02:12 -0500
From: Steve Shockley <suppressed>

Gruzicki Wlodek wrote:

 ( By default banner hasn't got set suid bit )

Why in the world would someone add a suid bit to banner? Maybe it's abug, but you had to work hard to turn it into a vulnerability.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
  - From: admin

References:
- *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
  - From: Gruzicki Wlodek

Prev by Date: RE: LS-20061113 - CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Next by Date: Re: Clarifying integer overflows vs. signedness errors
Previous by thread: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Next by thread: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Mail converted by mhonarc 2.6.15
This archive provided courtesy of JSW4.NET, Internet Hosting Services for Small Business.