Re: [Bigsister-general] Monitor::snmp

[little <suppressed>]

Matt,

i've checked and double checked. Everything looks ok.
it's certainly not the value's of the host it's uxmon is running on. and 
not of the bs server.

all numbers correspond to the bluecoat. I only see cpu load and nothing 
like uptime, memory, swap, etc.

Matt Kettler wrote:

> At 11:51 AM 2/10/2005, little wrote:
>
> > I'm having a bluecoat proxy server
> >
> > 1.1.1.1(wherever-bluecoat)       community=anycommunity warnload=10% 
> > cpuload
> >
> > and it is showing different kinds of cpuloads which correspond to the 
> > actual load.
>
>
> Check again *VERY* closely. Are you SURE that it's the right cpuload 
> for the target system and not localhost? Be sure to check the reported 
> memory size and process list... Are they right?
>
> Mine tells me my mailserver is running bsmon.. It also has the wrong 
> uptime, load, memory size, swap size, etc... but all of these values 
> match the ones for the host running uxmon.
>
> cpuload doesn't work for remote hosts over SNMP. It merely has the 
> illusion of working. It's giving you bogus data.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bigsister-general mailing list
suppressed
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bigsister-general